| Date of Evaluation |
Percentile% Rank within Breed |
Star rating within Breed |
PTA |
Reliability |
Percentile% Rank across Breed |
Star rating across all Breeds |
| Sep 2025 |
96 |
|
0.05 |
97 |
67 |
|
| May 2025 |
96 |
|
0.05 |
97 |
67 |
|
| Date of Evaluation |
No. of progeny |
No. of herdmates |
Age of progeny at scoring |
Age of herdmates at scoring |
| Sep 2025 |
229 |
907 |
83 |
78 |
| May 2025 |
229 |
904 |
83 |
77 |
| Date of Evaluation |
Average progeny docility score |
Average herdmate docility score |
% of progeny with poor docility scores (4 or 5) |
% of herdmates with poor docility scores (4 or 5) |
| Sep 2025 |
1.8 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
| May 2025 |
1.8 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
| Date of Evaluation |
No. of progeny |
No. of herdmates |
Age of progeny at scoring |
Age of herdmates at scoring |
| Sep 2025 |
144 |
553 |
88 |
76 |
| May 2025 |
144 |
553 |
88 |
76 |
| Date of Evaluation |
Average progeny docility score |
Average herdmate docility score |
% of progeny with poor docility scores (4 or less) |
% of herdmates with poor docility scores (4 or less) |
| Sep 2025 |
8.2 |
7.9 |
0 |
1 |
| May 2025 |
8.2 |
7.9 |
0 |
1 |
Note: Farmer recorded calf docility scores on pedigree animals are not used in an
evaluation unless the animals are also linear scored through the Whole Herd Performance Recording
Programme (WHPR)
| Date of Evaluation |
Dam pta docility |
Average % in dams by breed |
| AA | BA | BB | CH | FR | HE | HO | LM | SI |
| Sep 2025 |
.03 |
4% | 1% | 2% | 6% | 2% | 4% | 8% | 52% | 13% |
| May 2025 |
.03 |
4% | 1% | 2% | 6% | 2% | 4% | 8% | 52% | 13% |