Date of Evaluation |
Percentile% Rank within Breed |
Star rating within Breed |
PTA |
Reliability |
Percentile% Rank across Breed |
Star rating across all Breeds |
Sep 2025 |
96 |
|
0.05 |
97 |
67 |
|
May 2025 |
96 |
|
0.05 |
97 |
67 |
|
Date of Evaluation |
No. of progeny |
No. of herdmates |
Age of progeny at scoring |
Age of herdmates at scoring |
Sep 2025 |
229 |
907 |
83 |
78 |
May 2025 |
229 |
904 |
83 |
77 |
Date of Evaluation |
Average progeny docility score |
Average herdmate docility score |
% of progeny with poor docility scores (4 or 5) |
% of herdmates with poor docility scores (4 or 5) |
Sep 2025 |
1.8 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
May 2025 |
1.8 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
Date of Evaluation |
No. of progeny |
No. of herdmates |
Age of progeny at scoring |
Age of herdmates at scoring |
Sep 2025 |
144 |
553 |
88 |
76 |
May 2025 |
144 |
553 |
88 |
76 |
Date of Evaluation |
Average progeny docility score |
Average herdmate docility score |
% of progeny with poor docility scores (4 or less) |
% of herdmates with poor docility scores (4 or less) |
Sep 2025 |
8.2 |
7.9 |
0 |
1 |
May 2025 |
8.2 |
7.9 |
0 |
1 |
Note: Farmer recorded calf docility scores on pedigree animals are not used in an
evaluation unless the animals are also linear scored through the Whole Herd Performance Recording
Programme (WHPR)
Date of Evaluation |
Dam pta docility |
Average % in dams by breed |
AA | BA | BB | CH | FR | HE | HO | LM | SI |
Sep 2025 |
.03 |
4% | 1% | 2% | 6% | 2% | 4% | 8% | 52% | 13% |
May 2025 |
.03 |
4% | 1% | 2% | 6% | 2% | 4% | 8% | 52% | 13% |