Docility
Ranking information
| Date of Evaluation |
Percentile Rank within breed |
Star rating within Breed |
PTA |
Reliability |
Percentile Rank across Breed |
Star rating across all Breeds |
| Nov 2019 |
99 |
|
0.30 |
77 |
99 |
|
| Sep 2019 |
99 |
|
0.31 |
76 |
99 |
|
Animal Welfare farmer recorded scores
| Date of Evaluation |
no of progeny |
no of herdmates |
Age of progeny at scoring |
Age of herdmates at scoring |
Average progeny docility score |
Average herdmate docility score |
% of progeny with poor docility scores (4 or 5) |
% of herdmates with poor docility scores (4 or 5) |
| Nov 2019 |
20 |
74 |
95 |
82 |
1.6 |
1.9 |
0 |
1 |
| Sep 2019 |
19 |
72 |
95 |
82 |
1.5 |
1.8 |
0 |
1 |
Linear scorer recorded scores
| Date of Evaluation |
no of progeny |
no of herdmates |
Age of progeny at scoring |
Age of herdmates at scoring |
Average progeny docility score |
Average herdmate docility score |
% of progeny with poor docility scores (4 or less) |
% of herdmates with poor docility scores (4 or less) |
| Nov 2019 |
18 |
39 |
94 |
85 |
8.2 |
7.9 |
0 |
0 |
| Sep 2019 |
15 |
37 |
93 |
86 |
8.2 |
7.9 |
0 |
0 |
Dams of Farmer Scored Progeny (Cows Mated to the Sire)
| Date of Evaluation |
Dam pta docility |
Average % in dams by breed |
| AA | BA | BB | CH | FR | HE | HO | LM | SI |
| Nov 2019 |
.1 |
8% | 0% | 1% | 0% | 0% | 66% | 7% | 6% | 5% |
| Sep 2019 |
.09 |
9% | 0% | 1% | 0% | 0% | 64% | 7% | 6% | 6% |
Inclusion in Terminal Index
| Date of Evaluation |
PTA |
Economic Weight (EW) |
€ Contribution PTA*EW |
| Nov 2019 |
0.30 |
17.02 |
5 |
| Sep 2019 |
0.31 |
17.02 |
5 |
Inclusion in Maternal Index
| Date of Evaluation |
PTA |
Progeny Economic Weight (PEW) |
€ Contribution Progeny 0.5*(PTA*PEW) |
Grand-progeny Economic Weight (GEW) |
€ Contribution Grand-Progeny 0.5*(PTA*GEW) |
Total contribution (€) |
| Nov 2019 |
0.30 |
14.72 |
4 |
73.60 |
11 |
15 |
| Sep 2019 |
0.31 |
14.72 |
5 |
73.60 |
11 |
16 |