Docility
Ranking information
| Date of Evaluation |
Percentile Rank within breed |
Star rating within Breed |
PTA |
Reliability |
Percentile Rank across Breed |
Star rating across all Breeds |
| Nov 2019 |
38 |
|
-0.04 |
93 |
29 |
|
| Sep 2019 |
45 |
|
-0.03 |
92 |
33 |
|
Animal Welfare farmer recorded scores
| Date of Evaluation |
no of progeny |
no of herdmates |
Age of progeny at scoring |
Age of herdmates at scoring |
Average progeny docility score |
Average herdmate docility score |
% of progeny with poor docility scores (4 or 5) |
% of herdmates with poor docility scores (4 or 5) |
| Nov 2019 |
113 |
655 |
57 |
64 |
2.3 |
2.3 |
3 |
3 |
| Sep 2019 |
113 |
655 |
57 |
64 |
2.3 |
2.3 |
3 |
3 |
Linear scorer recorded scores
| Date of Evaluation |
no of progeny |
no of herdmates |
Age of progeny at scoring |
Age of herdmates at scoring |
Average progeny docility score |
Average herdmate docility score |
% of progeny with poor docility scores (4 or less) |
% of herdmates with poor docility scores (4 or less) |
| Nov 2019 |
5 |
101 |
80 |
88 |
7.8 |
7.9 |
0 |
1 |
| Sep 2019 |
5 |
101 |
80 |
88 |
7.8 |
7.9 |
0 |
1 |
Dams of Farmer Scored Progeny (Cows Mated to the Sire)
| Date of Evaluation |
Dam pta docility |
Average % in dams by breed |
| AA | AU | BB | CH | FR | HE | HO | LM | SI |
| Nov 2019 |
.01 |
5% | 4% | 5% | 17% | 1% | 5% | 9% | 26% | 9% |
| Sep 2019 |
.02 |
5% | 4% | 5% | 17% | 1% | 5% | 9% | 26% | 9% |
Inclusion in Terminal Index
| Date of Evaluation |
PTA |
Economic Weight (EW) |
€ Contribution PTA*EW |
| Nov 2019 |
-0.04 |
17.02 |
-1 |
| Sep 2019 |
-0.03 |
17.02 |
-1 |
Inclusion in Maternal Index
| Date of Evaluation |
PTA |
Progeny Economic Weight (PEW) |
€ Contribution Progeny 0.5*(PTA*PEW) |
Grand-progeny Economic Weight (GEW) |
€ Contribution Grand-Progeny 0.5*(PTA*GEW) |
Total contribution (€) |
| Nov 2019 |
-0.04 |
14.72 |
-1 |
73.60 |
-1 |
-2 |
| Sep 2019 |
-0.03 |
14.72 |
0 |
73.60 |
-1 |
-2 |